Behavioural Theories
World War II provided a huge stimulus for studies into leadership, particularly in the United States. Experience with a large number of people in leadership roles in the armed forces showed that some of them were highly effective and some were ineffective. Given that most of these people had undergone a relatively similar selection process, the question was what made some of them better leaders than others. One example was bomber commanders, some of whom managed to fly hundreds of sorties, drop their bombs on target and on time and return to base on schedule, while others got lost, got shot down, dropped their bombs on the wrong target and failed to get home. Why were some commanders better at the job than others?
About $500,000 was spent in the early 1950s by the US Department of Defence to investigate this phenomenon. The result was what are known as the Ohio State Studies. Vast amounts of data were collected, analysed and subjected to various statistical techniques. The resulting conclusion was that two variables accounted for about two thirds of what leaders did. The Ohio State researchers called these two things initiating structure (essentially a focus on task, organising things and getting them completed) and consideration (essentially a focus on people and relationships).
Out of this came the first big commercial leadership style model, the Managerial Grid (Blake and Mouton.) Blake talked about styles in terms of numbers on the grid – i.e. where a person’s behaviour fitted on the two scales: their degree of concern for people and their degree of concern for production. Essentially he was saying that these two scales are independent of one another. That is, your score on one does not affect your score on the other.
Continue reading "Professor Robin Stuart-Kotze Behavioural Theories" »